If architectural objects are treated as the results of definite, purposeful human activity, it has-to be admitted that each architectural form in its essence was created by a necessity, by construction methods, commission and the limited possibilities of its implementation. Only gradually, in the course of its creation and specification it turns into an artistic object. This process is well known to all architects, a process that, more or less conscious, takes place every day, and for each architect is very individual, subjective and is of utmost importance. In fact, it is a question why a building in each given case looks the way it looks and not differently. Without attempting to analyze the tendencies of a given architect's work, styles, schools, regional features or epochs, rising above it to the highest degree of generalization, the chosen object is method, common issues of different samples and approaches. This work should be perceived as a practical, not theoretical discourse also because it systematizes the principles of creative activities according to their deepest essence and not outer characteristics of works.