A Review and Comparative Analysis of Methods for Determining Criteria Weights in MCDM Tasks
2023
Oleg Uzhga-Rebrov, Gaļina Kuļešova

To select optimal solutions in multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) problems, many practical approaches have been developed. In almost all of these approaches, it is necessary to assess the importance of individual criteria for decision makers. Subjective assessments of importance are transformed into numerical assessments of decision weights by applying appropriate computational procedures. A large number of methods for determining the weights of the criteria have been proposed. These methods differ in their operating principles and in the calculation procedures underlying each method. The paper presents the most well-known methods of this kind and provides a brief comparative analysis of them.


Atslēgas vārdi
criteria weights, multicriteria decision making, ordinal comparison of criteria, relative importance of criteria, relative quantitative comparison of criteria
DOI
10.7250/itms-2023-0005
Hipersaite
https://itms-journals.rtu.lv/article/view/itms-2023-0005

Uzhga-Rebrov, O., Kuļešova, G. A Review and Comparative Analysis of Methods for Determining Criteria Weights in MCDM Tasks. Information Technology and Management Science, 2023, Vol. 26, No. 1, 35.-40.lpp. ISSN 2255-9094. Pieejams: doi:10.7250/itms-2023-0005

Publikācijas valoda
English (en)
RTU Zinātniskā bibliotēka.
E-pasts: uzzinas@rtu.lv; Tālr: +371 28399196